Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+spotting\s+\-\s+now\s+ARRL\s+and\s+Remote\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:15:28 -0500
WOW Paul - what a truly disappointing response! First, the ARRL, when whomever decided unilaterally to treat remote the same as just using a keyer, they did so without ANY open discussion with the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00095.html (14,715 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bourque <pbourque@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:43:15 -0400
How is this a disappointing response? Remote operation is allowed. What matters is the contact is made between 2 stations, and all contact information is exchanged via amateur radio between those 2 s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00100.html (16,294 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:39:03 -0400
Hey Bob I tend to agree with you on remote operating, but Im not I consider Bluetooth the same. After all, isnt BT just a short-range replacement for a mic cable, headphone cable, or similar? Dont yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00103.html (16,016 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 11:30:00 -0400
I have never operated remotely so I am wondering what advantage remote stations have over non-remote stations that you feel they should be in a separate category? Obviously many remote stations are l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00108.html (10,112 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 14:39:35 -0400
I suppose that some would be OK with the invisible mic cable if it was located in a ham band? Common sense should rule. -Steve K8LX On 03/17/24 11:30 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote: I have never operated re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00111.html (11,262 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:20:31 -0700
I agree with most of your post, but this jumps out at me as absolutely false. These are expensive places to get to, so NOT available to "nearly anyone." And they expose the traveler to COVID, a big d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00112.html (8,361 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:20:27 -0400
Give me a break: you're creating excuses now. You can fly from San Francisco to Boston for $250 round trip - nonstop. That is not expensive. You can fly from San Francisco to Aruba for as low as $450
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00116.html (8,945 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:43:43 -0500
Paul, Your response was disappointing because it ignored what I wrote previously and your follow-up reply (cited below) also ignored what I objected, to in detail. It was obvious that you either didn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00121.html (19,138 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:23:36 +0000
<snip> Remote operation is allowed. What matters is the contact is made between 2 stations, and all contact information is exchanged via amateur radio between those 2 stations. The method of control,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00125.html (10,516 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:07:28 -0700
And there are living expenses once you get there, the cost of renting the station. For many hams, that's a lot of money. And you're exposing yourself to COVID, which is an issue for older hams. I've
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00126.html (8,675 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:33:50 -0400
Jesus, it seems like you'll make excuses for anything. And make some bad assumptions. I traveled 88,000 miles last year and was at several conferences with hundreds of other attendees - never got COV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00128.html (9,917 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:35:39 -0400
Is a boat race not a boat race if you overslept and had to drive a car to get to the dock, thereby starting late? What are you, a race car driver? -Steve K8LX <snip> Remote operation is allowed. What
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00129.html (11,097 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: <charlie@thegallos.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:03:55 -0400
All I can say about all the arguments about what is, vs "what should be" is that if you don't like the rules, don't play 73 de KG2V Is a boat race not a boat race if you overslept and had to drive a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00130.html (11,725 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:44:41 -0400
I prefer If you dont like the rules, operate, have fun, and dont submit a log. Let operating be its own reward Not to argue the point, of course. 73, Ron W3WN ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00131.html (13,273 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 03:08:45 -0700
On 3/18/2024 12:33 PM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote: I traveled 88,000 miles last year and was at several conferences with hundreds of other attendees - never got COVID. I saw hundreds of contesters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00133.html (9,300 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting - now ARRL and Remote (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:05:00 -0400
Looking at his last sentence, I don't think Rich is advocating against vaccination - exactly the contrary.  He seems to be saying it has worked for him and his mother, despite a variety of relatively
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00134.html (10,089 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu