Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Scary\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Scary\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:09:55 +0000; I loaded a call history file into N1MM+ for this weekends SS CW. Out of over 500 contacts, just seven were NOT in that file. Five of them had checks from the last century. 73, de Hans, KØHB "Just a b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00013.html (6,367 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 17:44:27 -0500; The one I got from the N1MM site had over 10,000. I was surprised by how many people weren't in it. My theory, at least, is that there's a little new blood every year, and a good thing. Too many c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00016.html (8,024 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: AB2E Darrell <ab2e@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:29:04 +0000; Pete, Good point about the new ops showing up. It's been 3 or 4 years since I operated SS CW more than just a couple hours. I noticed quite a few CKs from 00-18. Also quite a number of ops coming bac; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00017.html (9,911 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:20:31 -0600; How many rookie operators are showing up in the CW version of the Rookie Roundup? That might give us a good indication of what the expect in the CW SS in years to come. 73 John W5TD _________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00018.html (11,733 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 06:53:19 -0400; I worked one stn with a check of "20"..that's right, "20" (I am sure many worked this stn as well) I had to process that one for a second..brain locks up..uhhhh, wha? Then, because I was doing an 83/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00019.html (7,756 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 06:30:50 -0500; There is a running assumption in SS discussions that all new contesters somehow end up doing SS. I find that hardly to be the case actually. Many contesters dont like sweepstakes. No offense to those; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00021.html (13,339 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:20:48 -0500; I worked a number of stations with checks in that range. Some also had "S" as their precedence, which probably explains it. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeaco; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00023.html (9,310 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 08:55:42 -0600; The Rookie Roundup is dismal! It is NOTHING like the Novice Roundup of like the 70's Participation levels are soo low, that a pretty good portion of the sections, you can make just one contact and ta; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00024.html (13,117 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 07:56:47 -0900; Agreed on all of this. One thing is, the newer cw operators (and there are more than you realize, check out .040-.060 above band edge) are generated by CWops and SKCC. If we want more CW contesters g; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00025.html (15,163 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:51 -0500; I invited a rookie to my station last year. We couldnt find very many participants. It made a bad impression. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." ___________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00026.html (14,794 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 23:14:20 -0500; The Rookie Roundup just doesn't work! It's nothing like the GLORY DAYS of the NOVICE ROUNDUP back in the late 1970's! I'll never forget that experience... Now folks are trying to forget about the RR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00029.html (16,528 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:33:58 -0500; So, I will buck the consensus. I've been doing SS about 42 years or so. When I started I was a snot-nosed teenager. In my first SS, I had to listen to a station 5 to 10 times before I got all his inf; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00036.html (18,867 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:32:10 -0500; i felt like I was flying in SS at 32 wpm, because tons of ops were running at 25 or so. One funny moment was when I worked NP2X who was flying on 15m on Saturday. On Sunday eve on 40m he was running; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00042.html (20,689 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:11:02 -0500; Steve, I agree with you. And I will go further to say that CW ops and SKCC are precisely the training grounds for new CW operators. We also need to market the technician CW privileges that they alrea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00043.html (17,645 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1): Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:31:16 -0500; I've frequently found in SS on Sunday that 24-26 wpm works better attracting the casual ops than 30-32. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00044.html (20,481 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]