Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SSB\s+Waveforms\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SSB\s+Waveforms\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SSB Waveforms (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:32:06 -0600; I'm looking for a nice set of what the audio of a SSB signal looks like processed vs non-processed. Anyone know of any? Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00096.html (6,418 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Waveforms (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:52:20 -0700; "Processed" covers a pretty wide range of possibilities, but if you knew what kind of processing (logarithmic, etc) you wanted you could create the waveforms yourself graphically. There are several; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00097.html (7,449 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Waveforms (score: 1): Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:17:20 +0000; There is some commentary on that topic here. https://www.cqww.com/ssbsignalquality.htm I'm looking for a nice set of what the audio of a SSB signal looks like processed vs non-processed. Anyone know; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00098.html (8,220 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Waveforms (score: 1): Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:36:32 +0200; Always when asked this question, I suggest to look at Figure 2 of https://www.ab4oj.com/icom/ssbcomp.html 73, Jukka OH6LI ma 27. helmik. 2023 klo 23.11 David Gilbert (ab7echo@gmail.com) kirjoitti: __; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00099.html (8,929 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Waveforms (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 13:51:03 -0800; There are two forms of audio processing that matter. The most important is equalization -- that is, elimination of low frequency audio contributes nothing to speech intelligibility but wastes half of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-02/msg00100.html (10,771 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]