Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Rules\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:23:53 -0000; Sweepstakes rule: 4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year you were first licensed); I worked a station, during ss phone, who I have known for many years. The station is an above average station a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00554.html (8,290 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:45:25 EST; Is it the stations year licensed, or the op's year licensed? 73-Chuck _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00555.html (8,806 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:11:29 -0500; On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 18:23:53 -0000. N7MAL said: ... When the op sent the check it was 30+ years off... <snip> My question is: Are the rules really rules or just guidelines we can all bend and twis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00558.html (10,415 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:44:54 -00; At my advanced age I sometimes forget the date on my first license. Maybe the same with them. I guess that confounds those who depend on a database for the information rather than actually copying w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00559.html (9,340 bytes)
5. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:58:17 -0700; I believe you can use the year of the station owners license or the operator(s). Who cares as long as you copy what they sent. Mike W0MU Sweepstakes rule: 4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00560.html (9,239 bytes)
6. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 21 Nov 2004 21:59:19 -0600; Man, one really did have to listen this year, a *lot* of the checks in my database were different from what the guys were sending. (and my database is made entirely from my own logs - so I can't blam; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00561.html (9,527 bytes)
7. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:09:19 -0800 (PST); In 2001 I moved from Iowa to Oklahoma and ran both the CW and SSB sweepstakes from here. It was interesting to see in the ARRL log checking report that several stations lost a QSO with me because the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00568.html (10,969 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:05:27 -0500; It isn't clear that the SS check is always the year of first licensing of the station owner. Many may interpret it to be the year first licensed of the station operator. What is clear is that it must; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00593.html (9,364 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:10:05 -0000; I have received many replies both on/off the mailing list and there are 3 common threads all through the replies. 1. The definition of is is. I thought the world had moved on. Clearly and IMHO very c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00594.html (11,053 bytes)
10. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:50:29 -0700; And what do Muti-ops do? Change their check each time the operator changes? Mike W0MU It isn't clear that the SS check is always the year of first licensing of the station owner. Many may interpret i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00604.html (10,107 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:29:09 -00; Awwww, those rascals, kicking the crutches away from cripples! For shame! 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00611.html (9,305 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:35:39 -0800 (PST); I use a check of "77", just cuz I like that number. I can't remember when I got my license, anyway. It was either late 78 or early 79. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00613.html (8,618 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:09:01 -0600; I was a guest at VE6JY this weekend, and he has resident in his TR directory a database. I noticed several times where the rx'd information differed from what was in the database. No big deal, you ju; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00616.html (13,463 bytes)
14. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:59:30 -0500; With our last M/S in SS, we handed out the same Check for every Q - regardless of who was opping at the time. Rich NN3W time the operator changes? _______________________________________________ CQ-C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00629.html (9,425 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:26:17 -0800; Why, that's nothing. Back in the days that the exchange was longer (before 1970) I ran across some multioperator stations signing one callsign and inserting another callsign into the exchange. Very c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00636.html (11,920 bytes)
16. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:50:24 -0000; Kelly here's the fly in your ointment. Contrary to popular belief there is only one station license assigned. In other words at this QTH N7MAL is the station license and any and all transmissions fro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00651.html (11,205 bytes)
17. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:08:28 -0800; Hello Guys... I have been following this debate, and I wanted to ask Mal a question: Mal, N7MAL SEZ: Mal, Are you saying that FCC has rules pertaining to contests? Yes, there are FCC regulations pert; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00668.html (10,044 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:23:32 -0600; Mal, due to various conflicts, I have not been able to play in SS for a long time. I do plan to before long. But, following this thread, I have a real problem. I don't know what year I was first lice; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00708.html (13,217 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:39:39 -0800 (PST); And does the year you were first licensed refer to any amateur license, or the year you received your first US license? 73s John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest http://li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00709.html (14,879 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:52:01 -0800; Actually they are, Mal. Since we are no longer required to sign /m or /p for mobile or portable, I can go anywhere in the CONUS and legally call CQ signing my callsign, W4EF. Now if that particular; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00710.html (11,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]