- 1. [CQ-Contest] SS Multi-Op (score: 1)
- Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:16:42 -0400
- WB9SBD: " Speaking of Multi-Op, Why does it seem that multi-op efforts in SS have all but vanished?" Gee, my impression is that it was growing. I think when I got started mid-1960s there were very fe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00200.html (7,209 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Multi-Op (score: 1)
- Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 07:00:55 -0600
- WB9SBD may have a point. It's a little tedious gathering a complete set of data, but here's some spot checks: 2017 SS CW - 34 multi-op entries (M and ML categories combined) 1997 SS CW - 88 multi-op
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00202.html (8,194 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Multi-Op (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Widelitz" <kwidelitz@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:02:49 -0700
- In theory, fewer M/O should generate more S/O and therefore more QSOs. 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00208.html (7,281 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Multi-Op (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:16:21 -0500
- The Multi Low power, some sections you could make 1 contact and take first place. Joe WB9SSBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 3/21/2018 8:00 AM
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00211.html (9,691 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu