Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Beef\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\s+Beef\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:59:30 -0500; I agree that leading zeros are a waste - but I think you will find that many of those sending them are using versions of CT where they have not "suppressed" the leading zeros.... ALSO - AS IN ANY CON; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00063.html (9,468 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 07:02:12 -0800; Try using a check of "23", Jim. I think I got "CK?" sent to me at least 200 times this past weekend. I guess people were skeptical of a 90 year old ham sending 35 wpm CW. Mike, W4EF..................; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00075.html (8,624 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:30:55 -0000; Hey Mike We all asked to make sure we had heard you correctly. I'm sure most of us thought with a scratch of the head did I hear that correct. I'm sure I would have questioned it if I was the least b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00087.html (10,091 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:24:09 -0600 (CST); I never gave the number sent much thought. It was just a number to me. I did happen to think a couple times that the station I worked might be a school club when it sent something like "13". The only; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00089.html (9,534 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 07:15:43 -0800; Probably in a few years those will be the only kind of contesters left... least West times this mebbe -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on pro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00090.html (9,780 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <mark@concertart.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:24:50 -0600; Rex, K7QQ explained: Actually, this is also the reason I ask when some crack op sends "NR 15" on Sunday. I copied it just fine, but just wanted to double check AND there's definitely time to be thoro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00091.html (8,713 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:49:42 -0800; Yes, Rex, all the repeat requests are understandable given the unusually low number we were sending. I have thought about using my own personal check "79", but then all of the people with "23" in the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00095.html (9,021 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "K0HB & K0CKB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:18:10 -00; year, if for no other reason than to confound the robots who auto-populate their logs with information not actually copied off the air in real time. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- The world's top contesters ba; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00096.html (8,754 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Beef (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:55:49 -0500; 23? That's nothing! When I was still associated with my college club (both as a student and then as an alumni working in town) we always through people for a loop with a check of "12" -- since 1912 w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00106.html (11,645 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]