Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\,\s+more\s+thoughts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\,\s+more\s+thoughts\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Sat Nov 8 22:01:15 1997; So, has anyone thought about the Year 2000 thing and how this will affect SS? Will we have to start sending 4-digit checks, or is this not a problem until the century is old enough that amateur radio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00197.html (7,184 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: froberts@pe.net (Fred Roberts); Date: Mon Nov 10 13:03:28 1997; Interesting thought. I have filed this comment in my millenium datebook and have scheduled it for review when I reach the age of 99. Fred, W6TKV - -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00258.html (7,427 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Nov 25 17:10:11 1997; An amusing thought, but not really a problem. It isn't important to know exactly what year the check represents. So, in 15 years, we won't know if a check of 12 means 1912 or 2012. The important thin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00517.html (8,001 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Tue Nov 25 20:21:37 1997; The SS Rules, published on page 116 of the October 1997 issue of QST defines CHECK as the "last two digits of year YOU were first licensed". Presumably, this means YOU, the OPERATOR, but as you note; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00524.html (7,387 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: jw@csd.uwm.edu (John Clifford Wilke); Date: Wed Nov 26 08:36:07 1997; That would mean that if we had 5 ops during our multi-op effort, we'd send 5 different checks! "Hey!...but you sent the last station CK76!" "Oh...we switched ops...that was him...this is me" Try exp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00529.html (7,883 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: dnorris@k7no.com (Dean Norris); Date: Wed Nov 26 11:42:08 1997; Is this really worthy of prolonged discussion. The purpose of the check is mainly to provide a number (2 digit) as part of the exchange. Would the ARRL disqualify a log if it contained erroneous data; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00532.html (7,385 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]