Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\,\s+SS\s+and\s+again\s+SS\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SS\,\s+SS\s+and\s+again\s+SS\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS, SS and again SS... (score: 1): Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:43:28 -0600; Hey Mats, don't go subterranean just yet! possibly for some other non-NA, have been ?less interesting?. That is MY (our) problem - not a problem to the list as such Actually, I think we have pretty m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00220.html (7,617 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS, SS and again SS... (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:17:17 -0600; In the US, at least, it seems that many new hams are getting into amateur radio almost solely for Emergency Communications (EMCOMM) and maybe some public service, and many local clubs here have taken; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00224.html (8,995 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS, SS and again SS... (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:00:39 +0000; Hey Ward, I will elaborate a little on the important theme that you raised and post them in a thread with a more logical title. There are for sure more suitable authors than me, more actively involve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00226.html (9,209 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS, SS and again SS... (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:12:49 +0300; John, I would say there is a big difference between EU and US when it comes to EMCOMM. Not at all the same focus on such communication here. For what reason is interesting to understand, but it seems; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00238.html (10,389 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]