- 1. [CQ-Contest] Sprint rules (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:14:50 -0500
- K8CC's comment on the Canadian mult rule reminded me -- the District of Columbia was on in the CW Sprint. I always thought it counted as Maryland, but I could not find this discussed anywhere in the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00173.html (8,072 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sprint rules (score: 1)
- Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:03:20 -0600
- Hmmmm - MAR is not a province. Might as well remedy that mistake at the same time :) Surely it won't change the character of the SPRINT contest to have more North American multipliers. Sylvan Katz -
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00185.html (7,546 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] SPRINT RULES (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:55:21 -0700
- After checking the NAQP Preliminary Results (Congrats, guys!), I decided to look at the SPRINT RULES. Hmmm... == 7. Exchange: To have a valid exchange, you must send all of the following information:
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00338.html (7,420 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT RULES (score: 1)
- Author: "Dennis Younker NE6I" <ne6i@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:36:50 -0700
- Notice the requirements: Other station's call Your call Your serial number Your name Your location (state, province or country) Nowhere in there is "de" and "k" a requirement. They are in the example
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00344.html (9,168 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT RULES (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:08:27 -0700
- Tnx...fellow NCCCer W0YK also just pointed this out to me. There may be others like myself who are a n a l about paragraph text and will gravitate more to specific "Examples". My suggestion would be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00355.html (8,269 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT RULES (score: 1)
- Author: "Lee Hiers" <aa4ga@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:09:13 -0400
- By this logic, one would be required to send only the callsigns indicated in the example. How much sense does that make? I believe the rules as originally quoted are adequately clear. Man, we need so
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00373.html (7,556 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT RULES (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:49:03 -0700
- Gee Rick - I see the word "must" with a list of the information that must be sent - and the word "may" preceding the example. And no - we don't need no stinkin' sunspots - see you all on 160 this se
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00397.html (7,620 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu