Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+Category\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+Category\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:01:52 -0500; Welcome to contesting. You may be interested to hear about my progression of increased scores and standings which runs completely counter to the theory that SO2R is worthy of a new category. I have b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00501.html (8,895 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:45:34 -0800; Snip Excellent testimony, Ed (N1UR). Unfortunately, it will probably have little impact on the mindless SO1R vs. SO2R rants. 73, Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00510.html (7,891 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:24:59 +0100; I can confirm: 2001-2004 = random wire, SmartTuner, 100W: approx 4000 QSO each year. 2004 = simple low multiband dipole, no 160m, 100W, 1 rig = 8125 QSO 2005 = started with a 21m tower, KT34XA triba; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00514.html (9,124 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:56:56 EST; The point is IT'S THE ANTENNAS and LOCATION that make the difference in many cases. Not SO2R. Indeed. Maybe we need a new category for SO2T (single op - two towers). Or for SO2R1T. And SO1R2T. And SO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00521.html (7,451 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:43:57 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:01:52 -0500, "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Since your second radio is no help, what kind is it and how much do you want for it?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00531.html (7,284 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:29:03 +0000; I am absolutely OK with what you are saying about antennas. My purpose was not to tell that ''SO2R'' should be a separate category, but just that the ''assisted'' one, for the same reasons as ''SO2R'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00533.html (9,186 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:57:49 -0500; The point I have made for over a year ... SO2R is but one tool and certainly not THE tool that is so dominant that it makes all others insignificant. Again, if you want to give your jihad for a sepa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00534.html (9,023 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:17:19 -0500; Gilles, In the case of radiosport, it is traditionally not the "advantage" as you put it that determines the category. It is like the difference in singles luge vs. two man bobsled vs. four man bobsl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00541.html (11,565 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:53:06 -0800; Ed wrote (among other things): Amen and amen brother :-) I could add another radio and be SO3R here and still be 5th from the bottom in the contests. Low beams and wire antennas here. If I had stacks; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00543.html (8,338 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:34:44 +0500; While everybody seems to be interested in SO2R and its advantages, here http://ua9clb.narod.ru are couple of audio files from recent CQWW CW that show how it can be done. 73, Igor UA9CDC ____________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00553.html (8,566 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: ku8e@bellsouth.net; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:11:21 +0000; Like any game (or competitive sport) those who have the most "toys" always win. It's no different with amateur radio contesting. Back when I started contesting in 1976 there was no computer logging,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00555.html (9,314 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:10:58 -0600; KU8E said: Like any game (or competitive sport) those who have the most "toys" always win. It's no different with amateur radio contesting. Back when I started contesting in 1976 there was no compute; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00560.html (8,680 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:04:41 -0700; I have to agree with Mark on this one. A lesser op at a great station does not guarantee a win. A great op at a lesser station does not guarantee a win either but my bet is on on the great op beating; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00562.html (9,780 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:08:58 +0100; Ku8E: All you need is some $$$ and you too can be a good (?) contester. S56A: All you need is some $$$ and you tWo can be a good contesterS. Unfortunaltely Balkans assisted version is slightly differ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00569.html (8,264 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:24:34 -0000; Unlike NASCAR, the top contenders in radiosport need all the backmarkers they can get in order to be on top. Contests would be very boring with only the big guns on the air. Not to mention the loss; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00572.html (10,422 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1): Author: ku8e@bellsouth.net; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:29:47 +0000; N5OT (me) says: I don't believe this for a second. There are plenty of guys with more stuff and bigger stations than I have whom I beat regularly. But more importantly there are a number who also tro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00575.html (9,559 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]