Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SDR\s+station\s+antenna\s+integration\s+$was\s+Paralleling\s+band\s+pass\s+filters$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SDR\s+station\s+antenna\s+integration\s+$was\s+Paralleling\s+band\s+pass\s+filters$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] SDR station antenna integration (was Paralleling band pass filters) (score: 1): Author: k3mm@verizon.net; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:43:59 -0600 (CST); You are of course correct, but most bandpass filter designs are just that...a high impedance everywhere but in the passband and they will work fine in parallel within reason. I'm not sure about tying; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00442.html (10,662 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SDR station antenna integration (was Paralleling band pass filters) (score: 1): Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>; Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:26:47 +0100; Away from the passband, the ONLY thing that is SURE about filter input is a high reflection coefficient, not any particular level of impedance. High reflection coefficient may mean any of these: shor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00444.html (7,813 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]