Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Rule\s+Changes\s+for\s+the\s+CQ\s+WW\s+WPX\s+SSB\s+and\s+CW\s+Contests\s+in\s+2021\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Trench" <aa3b.bud@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:01:55 -0500
The 2021 CQ WW WPX RTTY, SSB and CW contests will include a new Multi-Transmitter Distributed category. Stations operating in this category may have a maximum of six transmitted signals, one per band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00096.html (9,070 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:48:26 -0600
I am sorry to see the unassisted category eliminated from the WPX contests. It was so much fun! I imagine that CQWW will eventually do the same. John KK9A QSO alerting systems will now be permitted i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00097.html (8,320 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:54:54 +0000
<snip> QSO alerting systems will now be permitted in all CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Single Operator categories, except the Single Operator Classic Overlay categories. That's a weasel way of announcing that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00098.html (10,915 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:20:50 -0300
hello Bud well, my idea was to ask, after CQWW CW, for a rule change in CQWW and CQ WPX to ask for audio recording ALSO to assisted stations and for more entries, not just World and Continent top sco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00099.html (11,814 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:45:08 -0700
Regarding spot use, glad to see some more contests moving with reality, Bud! I operated just a few hours in SS CW on Sunday afternoon. It's always interesting to see how quickly some prec A/B guys fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00100.html (10,138 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:47:36 -0500
Does it mean that "Classic" sub-category operators won't be allowed to operate more than 24 hours? My understanding was that CQ WPX (same as in CQ WW DX) allowed more than 24 hours of operation and o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00101.html (9,727 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:49:10 +0200
I don't understand this at all as same time this contest has Classic-overlay. Do they mean that: "Classic overlay is a whismy and not a real class and is not needed to check for cheating"? 36-hour c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00102.html (8,915 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:34:19 +0000
I expect that it will be like the CQ WW where only the first 24 hours of operating time counts for the classic overlay score. Will be clear when the new rules hit the web page. Randy K5ZD --Original
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00103.html (10,447 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
As someone who develops logging/SDR software for unassisted use,  this statement is false and a bad excuse for the decision to eliminate single op. It is very easy to distinguish: if the software ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00104.html (9,866 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:42:43 +0000 (UTC)
The more troubling change to me is the essentially no-limits distributed multiops. Competitive Multi-op, especially multi-multi, over the years has been a category for conspicuous consumption station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00105.html (10,503 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:31:48 -0500
Current WPX Rule: /3. Classic Operator (CLASSIC): The entrant will use only one radio, no QSO finding assistance, and the one radio must not be able to receive while transmitting. Operator Assisted e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00107.html (10,314 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:38:26 -0500
"The 2021 CQ WW WPX RTTY, SSB and CW contests will include a new Multi-Transmitter Distributed category. Stations operating in this category may have a maximum of six transmitted signals, one per ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00108.html (13,105 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:53:58 -0500
And that wasn't a very good idea either.... On 11/16/2020 02:38 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote: "The 2021 CQ WW WPX RTTY, SSB and CW contests will include a new Multi-Transmitter Distributed category. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00109.html (13,590 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:58:02 +0200
As I read the rules, there is a category for the un-assisted. Behold! - - - VI. ENTRY CATEGORIES: A. Single Operator Categories:One person (the operator) performs all operating and logging functions.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00110.html (11,645 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:14:47 -0700
It's a new M/M category, not a replacement for the existing M/M category.   It's an "addition", not a "change".   What causes that to be such a bad idea?  Maybe it is, but I'm having a difficult time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00111.html (12,341 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: dimitri <cosson-dimitri@bbox.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:06:03 +0100
Hi Tor, Where is the problem ? Check the score database and you'll see that SO unassisted scores are higher than assisted most of the time so... 73 de Dimitri F4DSK Télécharger BlueMail pour Android
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00112.html (11,275 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:45:39 -0500
Jukka But only 24 hours. They haven't updated the CQ WPX webpage yet. Jeff Behold! - - - VI. ENTRY CATEGORIES: A. Single Operator Categories:One person (the operator) performs all operating and loggi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00114.html (12,486 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:58:07 -0500
Why even bother to have a distributed category?  It's so EASY to setup one station to remote into. In fact I did it with someone in CA who wasn't even setup as a remote station beforehand for the Cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00115.html (14,036 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 17:07:21 -0500
I am very disappointed that the CQ WPX Contests eliminated single operator categories. It isn't a merger - there is nothing left of the single operator category rules. Unfortunately, now the internet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00119.html (13,754 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:47:58 +0000
As the result of this rule change announcement, operators who prefer to operate without assistance are left with a single choice: 'Classic' . But even this entry option has been substantially modifie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00120.html (12,867 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu