Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Roofing\s+filter\s+improvements\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Roofing filter improvements? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@fidmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:12:04 -0800
I have a mid level, late 90s rig on the way that has had the INRAD roofing filter installed in it. This is supposed to be a 5 to 6khz wide roofing filter, not some of the real narrow ones we are seei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00164.html (7,174 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Roofing filter improvements? (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:11:57 +0200
John, The so-called roofing filter potentially enhances your radio's front end behaviour from signals more than about 4 or 5 kHz away from the frequency you listen to. In case you have real signals c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00181.html (9,549 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Roofing filter improvements? (score: 1)
Author: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:30:20 +0100
Sounds like a good rig to me. Those INRAD filters sure can change a mid level rig into something more usable. I had a FT 990 which wasn't a bad transceiver to start with. But after swapping the origi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00184.html (8,897 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu