Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remove\s+that\s+Word\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remove\s+that\s+Word\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:22:47 -0700; I've got a better idea - how about we get **RID** of the word "assisted" entirely? It is far too vague to be of any use when we are really talking about sources and movement of information. I sugges; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00305.html (8,359 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: "Marty Bluhm" <w8aks55@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:43:33 -0500; Ward, I think you have hit the nail on the head. This is the best solution I've seen with all the bs that has been floating around this reflector. My delete key is getting worn out. Thanks for a liva; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00309.html (8,992 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:22:24 -0400; This is the first step to clearing up the issue, Ward. Too often we have the word "assisted" used as almost a pejorative, as if it was a lower class. That would work. Perhaps a 1,2,3 or a,b,c class w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00310.html (8,786 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:21:35 -0500; I've made that suggestion numerous times. If you can't define it, get rid of it. Seems simple enough to me. 73 -- Paul VO1HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00317.html (9,442 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:52:44 -0500; Very Good Ward: I guess that's why you're the ham of the year and I'm not. That is an interesting approach and a very good one. Instead of constantly trying to redefine a word eliminate it and replac; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00319.html (9,967 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:58:55 -0600; A corollary: If you don't have a method for detecting the use of a technology then don't rule on it until you do. ... Sylvan Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX Saskatoon, SK ________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00322.html (7,582 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:00:56 +0000; N0AX responded to K0RC: Talk about treating the symptom rather than the disease... How does the definition change if the label changes? What is different if you call it "Single Op Ralph"? Nothing - a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00325.html (8,913 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]