Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+operation\s+by\s+out\s+of\s+staters\s+in\s+state\s+QSO\s+parties\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+operation\s+by\s+out\s+of\s+staters\s+in\s+state\s+QSO\s+parties\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote operation by out of staters in state QSO parties (score: 1): Author: K3TN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:56:46 +0000 (UTC); This issue came up in the WV QSO party a few years ago, when the rules were changed to prohibit remote operation of in-state stations. A number of hams who operate remotely, and some who have houses; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00040.html (8,488 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation by out of staters in state QSO parties (score: 1): Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:52:43 -0400; I'm not sure why they make such a big deal about this. I contacted WN4AFP about a score of mine that was missing and found out they just pull claimed scores from 3830. So basically I could submit a f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00046.html (9,762 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation by out of staters in state QSO parties (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 19:38:13 -0400; Fellow contesters, The State QSO Party group will be evaluating the 2020 SQP Challenge awards program during the next 4-6 weeks, as part of our planning process for the 2021 QP season. Our team of ex; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00095.html (11,249 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]