Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+Operation\,\s+et\s+al\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+Operation\,\s+et\s+al\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation, et al. (score: 1): Author: D Rodman MD <rodman@buffalo.edu>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:43:35 -0400; I have skimmed over some of the bandwidth concerning remote operation. I have been operating my station by remote control for over 10 years. We have developed an elaborate interface system using vari; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00327.html (7,971 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation, et al. (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:26:39 +0200; I always work with 100mS transmit delay in Wintest as I use amps and antenna switches with open frame relays. So far I did not feel any disadvantage about it. 73 Peter Even a hundred milliseconds of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00329.html (7,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]