Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Remote\s+Control\s+in\s+Contesting\s+\-\s+A\s+Summary\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:39:48 +0100
Felipe NP4Z said, on 23 June, "And talking about not using cliches, I just cant avoid it... everywhere you go particularly in business school everyone says, "Those who don't adopt technology dissapea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00323.html (10,935 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Hal Offutt" <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:47:36 -0400
Paul O'Kane asks: So - what is our core activity? Could it be anything other than contesting using ham-radio RF as our sole communications medium? The word "sole" makes this a loaded question. The an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00324.html (13,567 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:02:21 -0500
Since an amateur radio license is required to do remote amateur radio, it is by international law an amateur radio activity. If it were only an Internet activity, then no license would be required. D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00325.html (14,268 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:22:20 -0400
What's wonderful about this world, Paul, is that you are free to express your ideas... no matter how long you beat the concept to death. If you follow what is happening with the CQ Contest committee,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00326.html (15,426 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:29:10 -0400
I figured you would not answer the question. Anyway, I have no particular aversion with W2LC's assertion, other than we don't need new rules -- the rules already state that you must be appropriately
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00330.html (11,128 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contesting - A Summary (score: 1)
Author: Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:17:27 +0000
No Paul, you did not get all these wrong. The problem is that the majority of those debating the matter are unable to grasp the full perspective of what remote control will do to ham radio contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00331.html (8,160 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu