Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Released\s+Rules\s+for\s+CQ\s+WW\s+WPX\s+SSB\s+\/\s+CW\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Trench" <aa3b.bud@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:26:14 -0500
The rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW are now posted at the CQ WW WPX Website < https://www.cqwpx.com/rules.htm >. The creation of the Multi-Transmitter Distributed category was triggered by the significa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00127.html (8,450 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:16:08 -0500
Bud,With all due respect I checked the CQ WPX database for the 2020 contests for both modes and there were more SO unassisted entries on both modes then there were for SO assisted . In fact on SSB th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00129.html (9,448 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:48:53 +0000
I understand there is a feeling of loss with this change. But, when I look at the WPX scores Hans, I see you have entered the WPX contest 5 times and 3 of those were in the assisted category (https:/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00130.html (9,919 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:40:26 -0500
Please give us UA ops the opportunity to compete dor 36 hours! Dave WN4AFP -- Dave Edmonds PK Ministry Webs 864.288.6678 dave@pkministrywebs.com www.pkministrywebs.com _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00131.html (11,369 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:03:40 +0200
hi, just one remark - comparison of the number of entries in SO unassisted categories in CQWW or CQWPX is somewhat misleading because very big number of casual entrants just enter SO Unassisted categ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00138.html (11,124 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:39:26 +0000
<snip> It's disappointing to see opinions stated as fact, or which don't tell the whole story. Choice has not been eliminated. That's true, but it fails to mention that choice has been reduced. (The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00152.html (9,708 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Richard Smith <n6kt1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:42:24 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Bud, It's too bad that you don't seem to have respect for operators who compete the contest for which you are now director. It seems that you intend to change the rules of the WPX Contest based on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00202.html (11,683 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Hal Offutt <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:45:01 +0900
Rich, I agree 100% with your conclusion but I think you are being a little hard on Bud.  Bud is one of the good guys.  He's a devoted contester, a great op and a radio friend to many of us.  Rather t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00204.html (14,952 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: "Bud Trench" <aa3b.bud@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:26:24 -0500
Thank you all for your inputs. I have my convictions on the rule changes and I own them. I have provided the rationale in a fully transparent manner. I believe the revised rule are in the long term b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00206.html (15,400 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:43:25 -0300
Hi Rich, With all due respect, I truly believe Bud doesn't deserve a single bit to be treated like in your email below. So sad somebody had the great idea of creating something like "World and Contin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00208.html (14,875 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: dimitri <cosson-dimitri@bbox.fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:44:28 +0100
Hi Bud and CC, Thanks very much for the work/time done for all of us 73 de Dimitri F4DSK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00211.html (17,552 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:50:42 +0000
Thank you all for your inputs. I have my convictions on the rule changes and I own them. I have provided the rationale in a fully transparent manner. I believe the revised rule are in the long term
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00212.html (9,280 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:47:29 +0000
I think what happens is someone volunteers for the WPX Director job. Realizes that 80% of the work deals with accusing, verifying, communicating, getting screamed at centered around cheating for spot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00214.html (9,271 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
Hold fast and stand by your guns, Bud. 73,ken, AB1J Thank you all for your inputs.  I have my convictions on the rule changes and I own them.  I have provided the rationale in a fully transparent man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00216.html (17,005 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: <gm3woj@christran.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:39:56 -0500
Hello all I was disappointed to read about these impending Rule changes. Was this a collective decision made by the Contest Director, and/or Committee, following consultation with entrants? I dont pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00217.html (9,194 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:30:50 -0500
If the vast majority support the changes, why does the survey data say otherwise? 73 Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00219.html (20,260 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:34:52 -0500
The cheaters out there won. They will find another way to cheat now they now don't have to worry about being detected using assistance. Jeff Thank you all for your inputs.  I have my convictions on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00220.html (10,861 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:35:57 -0500 (EST)
Hi Dimitri: The VAST majority of contesters don't read CQ-Contest! :-) 73, Mark, KD4D _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00221.html (20,029 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:53:11 +0000
Bingo! 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@contesting.com> on behalf of Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com> Sent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00222.html (11,718 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Released Rules for CQ WW WPX SSB / CW (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:56:52 -0300
That is a fallacy. Those new ways you talk about have been implemented "since forever" and have been perfected starting 2002. 73, Martín LU5DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00223.html (11,226 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu