Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Regional\s+Results\s+vs\s+Distance\-Based\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Regional\s+Results\s+vs\s+Distance\-Based\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Regional Results vs Distance-Based (score: 1): Author: Steve Walter <stevewalter90@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:52:45 -0500; For the US, regional rankings make the most sense to me and could be easily implemented. Call areas, divisions, states and sections are all useful but established regions might be better and less emp; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00186.html (7,585 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regional Results vs Distance-Based (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:52:19 -0700; Regional, distance and time.. make up a very interesting contest... and THAT evaluates not only a station..but also the operator. Now.. to make it completely fair.. do it at qrp power.oh .. wait.. th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00193.html (7,716 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Regional Results vs Distance-Based (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:28:45 +1000; To test the distance hypothesis, it could be overlaid over CQWW Logs - They are public logs after all.. By taking the Cetrepoint of each zone as the Dx start point a model could be developed. Taking; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00195.html (9,981 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]