Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Receiver\s+Gain\s+$Was\s+TOP\s+BAND\s+RECEIVING\s+ANTENNAS$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Receiver\s+Gain\s+$Was\s+TOP\s+BAND\s+RECEIVING\s+ANTENNAS$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Receiver Gain (Was TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS) (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Tue Jan 8 14:15:02 2002; Most HF receivers do not have enough gain for decent AGC action on weak CW signals. (The insertion loss of the CW filters can reduce IF gain considerably.) This is particularly so on 10M, even with a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00096.html (9,518 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Receiver Gain (Was TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS) (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Tue Jan 8 23:02:08 2002; The latest ARRL test of ICOM 756 PRO II shows reasonable HF RX sensitivity figures. Also notice significant PLL noise reduction. IMD3 leaves about 10 dB room for improvement. Most of the previous tes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00101.html (11,256 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]