Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Really\s+tired\s+of\s+erroneous\s+Cabrillo\s+error\s+messages\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:51:01 -0500
Wow - it is with great sadness that I see messages complaining about the Cabrillo robots. I think there are some important points that are being missed by those complaining. 1. The robots have greatl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00188.html (9,291 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:02:04 +0300
To the log checker all items below are as important as to a computer. If a log is not right, it has to be fixed. I fixed about 250 logs, I asked maybe 100 logs to be fixed and I had friends fixing so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00196.html (11,093 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:04:24 -0700
<snip> _________________________________________________________ The robots are a great help, no complaint about their existence. My complaint is they are doing the same dumb things, year after year.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00199.html (9,369 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:55:04 -0000
Good one. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00206.html (10,598 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:33:08 +0000
From http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/spec.html CATEGORY: operator-category band-category power-category [mode-category] For HF contests the operator-category must be one of the following: SINGLE-OP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00207.html (10,289 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:57:48 +0000
Problem with engaging brain before enough tea has been consumed first thing in the morning - I wrote: The robot was right - although there may be no high or low power categories in CQ WW RTTY, the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00209.html (8,701 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:31:59 -0400
On Sep 28, 2004, at 5:55 PM, Steve Baron - KB3MM wrote: One other suggestion for the contest sponsors: Include in the rules a link to a web page showing all possible correct forms of Cabrillo headers
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00211.html (9,253 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:57:37 -0000
Bill, I did not say what your message attributes to me. I did send a simple one liner that simply said: Good one. Take a look in the archive. -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00212.html (9,971 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu