Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:Packet\s+absurdity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:Packet\s+absurdity\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: John Cashen <vk4uc@bigpond.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:46:17 +1000; Clearly most everyone thinks self spotting breaks the Unassisted rule. Cheerleading had mixed opinion, but seemed to focus on clubs and other more informal groups rather than the unaffiliated operato; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00237.html (8,896 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:00:03 -0600; This SS, I had one station ask to be spotted. I replied that his request put him in the multi operator class, and spotted him, and said in the spot text that the station had requested to be spotted,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00245.html (7,925 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:09:14 -0600; Hi John, I note the following passage from CQ WW rules. "...The use of DX alerting assistance of any kind places you in the single-operator, assisted class." I would say that by requesting to be spot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00250.html (10,455 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:17:38 -0500 (EST); actually he should be dq'ed... read general rule 3.14 at: http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-all.html _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00255.html (8,276 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 06:57:04 -0800; I should think that the multioperator class disallows self spotting in the SS also, as would the unlimited. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00256.html (8,411 bytes)
6. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:45:14 -0600; Thanks for the no-self-spotting rule pointer for SS; at the time I couldn't remember if SS explicitly prohibited self spotting or not. But I should have included in my original post that while I had; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00268.html (7,953 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re:Packet absurdity (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:28:56 -0800; It's not just the SS - it's in the General Rules for All ARRL Contests. -- Kenneth E. Harker WM5R kenharker@kenharker.com http://www.kenharker.com/ _______________________________________________ CQ-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00273.html (7,969 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]