- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Response to K5ZD's Comments (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard J. Norton" <ae327@lafn.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:39:03 -0800
- Almost exactly 11 years ago there was a posting on this reflector that summed up a few of the threads present at that time. At first I thought that there might be an 11 year sunspot-related cycle imp
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00284.html (13,409 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Response to K5ZD's comments (score: 1)
- Author: sawyered@earthlink.net
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:06:17 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- I must admit I find some of the comments on this interesting. Before commenting on some of the responses, I will state that I like the 48 hour time. Its a contest, lets not water it down. However, if
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00344.html (9,343 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Response to K5ZD's comments (score: 1)
- Author: <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:46:20 -0500
- I will/can never be competetive to the point of winning in a 48 hr test. I am not a ( 48 hr ) competetive contester Some of the younger contesters just cant comprehend the effects of being in your 5
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00357.html (10,943 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu