- 1. [CQ-Contest] re: QSL's en masse (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
- Date: Tue Feb 17 20:07:40 1998
- 1st read this from K4BAI: Many of the folks on this list using this meathod. I agree, that it is taking advantage of the system. Not everyone wants a QSL and burdening the League's staff to make our
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00183.html (7,786 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] re: QSL's en masse (score: 1)
- Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Feb 18 10:27:06 1998
- I was reading the ARRL's lament about the DXCC program not paying for itself in the new QST. I have a simple answer to their fiscal dilemma. Allow us to send stateside cards to the incoming QSL burea
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00195.html (6,494 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Re: QSL's en masse (score: 1)
- Author: k0hb@juno.com (Hans Brakob)
- Date: Thu Feb 19 10:18:11 1998
- Tom, I forwarded your message to K1ZZ. His response is attached. 73, Hans, K0HB/4ID I was reading the ARRL's lament about the DXCC program not paying for itself in the new QST. I have a simple answer
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00204.html (8,055 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu