Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+QRZ\s+no\s+call\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+QRZ\s+no\s+call\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: QRZ no call (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@centurytel.net (Ward Silver); Date: Sun Apr 6 20:31:36 2003; I agree with Martin on this one, although US stations are SUPPOSED to ID with each contact. I don't mind listening to a snappy operator working down the pileup quickly at a good rate, giving his cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00154.html (7,757 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: QRZ no call (score: 1): Author: jskatz@sk.sympatico.ca (Sylvan Katz); Date: Mon Apr 7 09:20:02 2003; down wasting My experience is that such snappy operators are a very rare breed! Most of the ones I encounter don't have the courtesy to ID unless a number of calling stations send "CALL? CALL? ... "; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00157.html (7,624 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: QRZ no call (score: 1): Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne); Date: Tue Apr 8 06:07:28 2003; But the ones who do it do it well. Everytime I work Jim and he sends "ZD8Z" after I'm done, I realize he means, "R, QSL, I got it, Thanks, See you later." Good operators don't need to give their call; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00165.html (6,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]