Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Polling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Polling\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Polling (score: 1): Author: Dave_Hoaglin@abtassoc.com (Dave_Hoaglin@abtassoc.com); Date: Fri Jan 11 18:38:35 2002; Pete, N4ZR, has usefully reminded us that it does not take a large sample to get a reasonable margin of error. (For a margin of error of + or - 3 percentage points, though, the sample size is more li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00220.html (7,974 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Polling (score: 1): Author: lee@dixieliner.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri Jan 11 20:07:05 2002; How do you determine a QST reader? If you mean all ARRL members, you are assuming all are QST readers, which probably isn't valid. Agreed. Random is easy. What is not easy is identifying the populati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00222.html (9,097 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]