Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Meaningful\s+Exchanges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+Meaningful\s+Exchanges\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Meaningful Exchanges (score: 1): Author: mdurham@cerulean.com (Marty Durham); Date: Tue Nov 30 21:01:09 1999; Interesting comments Paul...except I would disagree that the exchange has to have somthing that you use your ears for...judging by the number of busted callsigns don't you think the callsign itself i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-11/msg00000.html (7,129 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: Meaningful Exchanges (score: 1): Author: sidwill@ab21.freeserve.co.uk (Sid Will); Date: Thu Dec 2 07:29:03 1999; Excuse please!! Like most contests, CQWW has a "purpose". It is to provide an opportunity to work all zones. (I think) If that is so, it needs to have the zone number in the exchange In doing that, i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00007.html (6,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]