- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: MI Redux (score: 1)
- Author: zf2nt@candw.ky (Bruce Sawyer)
- Date: Sun Mar 7 01:09:05 1999
- I see your point, and you are absolutely right. Until I got your note, I saw that call as simply another ham call; it was just a 1 x 3 call that had no significance. But since you pointed this out, a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00065.html (7,918 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: MI Redux (score: 1)
- Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
- Date: Mon Mar 8 10:57:25 1999
- Hi Bruce: I don't know if it will make any difference, but I'd include with my log to ARRL a note about what time this happened and alert them to the problem. Maybe they can waive any penalties for c
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00106.html (7,061 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu