Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+Awards\s+\/\s+Contest\s+logs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+Awards\s+\/\s+Contest\s+logs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL Awards / Contest logs (score: 1): Author: MPeiperl@london.edu (Maury Peiperl); Date: Mon Apr 8 20:01:22 2002; Sylvan, that may be the single best idea I have ever heard in the DXCC / Awards area. You are talking about confirmed contacts; that is, contacts for which the League already has both logs and has co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00088.html (7,749 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL Awards / Contest logs (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Tue Apr 9 16:20:21 2002; I may be QCWA material, though am still on the wrong side of 40 to have a senior moment (or so I would like to think), but didn't ARRL used to give DXCC credit in the past for those who worked a DX s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00100.html (6,860 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL Awards / Contest logs (score: 1): Author: BobK8IA@aol.com (BobK8IA@aol.com); Date: Tue Apr 9 13:14:47 2002; =A0=20 =A0 =A0 All entries logs submitted to an ARRL contest and verified by the contest checking software should automatically be accredited to any ARRL award for which it is considered to be a val; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00101.html (7,336 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL Awards / Contest logs (score: 1): Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos); Date: Tue Apr 9 21:32:35 2002; I think it is reasonable to expect LoTW to do this, although obviously not in its first implementation. There are all kinds of neat things eQSLing will make possible that we can never think of. Who t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00104.html (9,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]