Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+40M\s+Bandplan\s+Conflicts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+40M\s+Bandplan\s+Conflicts\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: 40M Bandplan Conflicts (score: 1): Author: nt5c@easy.com (John Warren); Date: Thu Oct 2 19:06:29 1997; And Ty didn't even mention that this whole mess is superimposed on the SSB DX band from 7040 up! As part of any new band plan, we need coincident U.S.and dx SSB operating privileges - at least 25KHz; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00040.html (6,765 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: 40M Bandplan Conflicts (score: 1): Author: n6bfm@avana.net (Bob Furzer); Date: Thu Oct 2 15:47:23 1997; A bandplan .. What a novel idea, I wonder if the concept will catch on? Does anyone (individual and/or organization) actually admit responsibility for this fiasco? I guess that is one point in favor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00042.html (7,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]