Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+1\s+and\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+1\s+and\s+2\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: 1 and 2 (score: 1): Author: yt3t@absolutok.net (Kele YT3T); Date: Tue Jun 11 21:27:47 2002; Zoli, The technique you're suggesting can only show if the station worked was called or calling. Nothing else. It is legal to make a QSO by any way - running or S&Ping in random order... How could yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00130.html (10,023 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Re: 1 and 2 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Michael Gilmer); Date: Tue Jun 11 22:00:04 2002; That may be true of some stations, but the legit ones are very quick to share the techniques they use...and have done so right here on this reflector. http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2000-Nov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00132.html (7,057 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]