Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Re\:\s+\[RTTY\]\s+CW\/RTTY\s+QRM\s+Saturday\s+evening\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:26:47 -0800
Why on earth were these two contests scheduled for the same weekend? Can anything be done to P-R-E-V-E-N-T this from happening next time? 73... Rick, K6VVA ___________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00104.html (8,352 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:53:50 -0500
We should all be asking N1ND how and why this happened. The NAQP CW has always been the 2nd weekend of Janaury. The RTTY Roundup has always been the 1st weekend of January....Except for this year, wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00105.html (9,382 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:21:28 -0700
-- Original Message -- From: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:26 PM Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00106.html (9,605 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:58:32 -0800
At 06:21 AM 1/7/2005, David Hachadorian wrote: New Year's Day falls on a Sunday next year, so I think this conflict is scheduled to happen again. I think the BARTG RTTY Sprint is scheduled for the th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00109.html (9,587 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Reid Hill <kc5ykx@swbell.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:20:42 -0800 (PST)
It is more like who the heck wants to do a contest with a hangover? Plus to much college football on. Not to many people are going to buck their New Years traditions for a contest so the ARRL moved i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00110.html (10,462 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:27:30 +0000
N6DE added to K6LL's post: -As Dave mentioned, be aware that you are likely going to hear RTTY stations on 40m as low as 7.040 (and potentially lower, though I certainly hope not). This is due to the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00126.html (9,273 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:35:22 -0600
There certainly was NO problem for NAQP CW on forty last night here in Texas - at most, I heard five or six RTTY in the 7035-7045, and they were well separated, and there were plenty of NA stations r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00134.html (8,718 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:29:49 -0800
___________________________________________________________ No problem for the CW guys, you mean. I was jammed at least five times on different frequencies operating RTTY. The method was so similar i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00138.html (9,111 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri Onipko VE3DZ" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:02:19 -0500
Not necessarily a contester, Bill. 73 VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00139.html (9,080 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:49:41 -0800
___________________________________________________________ I didn't say it was. I doubt that a serious CW contester would waste his time. It's purely a CW vs RTTY thing. I've gotten similar jamming
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00140.html (9,222 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu