Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Radio\s+Comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Radio\s+Comparison\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Radio Comparison (score: 1): Author: morel@shani.net (morel); Date: Fri Jun 20 10:17:05 1997; Scott, I checked all these four rigs on same antennas and my choice was FT-1000D. If you don't need a dual cross band receiver, a 200W output and a heavy duty rig, you can choose FT-1000MP. The IC-77; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00216.html (8,247 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Radio Comparison (score: 1): Author: kimo@lava.net (Kimo C. Chun); Date: Fri Jun 20 12:31:54 1997; Scott, It seems Morel and Bud have kind of covered it. We have used all but the ICOM 775 DSP at the multi-multi contest station here. Since performance issues can be subjective I may as well give yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00221.html (7,855 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Radio Comparison (score: 1): Author: w4zw@juno.com (Jon E Hamlet); Date: Mon Jun 23 18:40:46 1997; Scott, I have three of the four sitting in front of me now. I have the Yaesu FT-1000D, the Yaesu FT-1000MP, and the Kenwood TS-950SDX. Until recently, I had the ICOM 775DSP. I did have 3 QTh;s, one i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00251.html (9,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]