Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+contesting\;\s+filters\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:15:35 -0400
Not really a RTTY contester, but when I do play, I am constantly bothered by my rx filtering setup. I currently run a pair of IC7410's in LSB (AFSK) mode. On RTTY I am currently SO1R, but I know how
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00089.html (8,112 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:27:40 -0800
An IF bandwidth of 600 Hz is ideal with our modern software decoders. (Narrower bandwidth introduces phase shift that degrades copy error rate.) Older radios often don't allow narrow filtering in SSB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00090.html (8,623 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:18:02 -0800
On 2/16/2021 1:27 PM, Ed Muns wrote: I do like lower tones and typically use 915/1085 which is less fatiguing over long periods. OTOH, their TX audio harmonic is still within the normal 2 kHz bandwid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00091.html (7,968 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:28:27 -0500
I am sure that is true on a quiet band. I wish that I could find a 600hz opening anywhere on 20m in last weekend's contest. Any QRM in my passband makes decoding very difficult. John KK9A An IF bandw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00098.html (7,602 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:56:13 -0500
I was cranked down to 200 hz and would have gone tighter if I could.....btw, congrats John on what appears to be a first place finish, I just couldnt get much going with low power this weekend.... Se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00099.html (9,093 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: Ed W0YK <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:39:49 -0800
Not my experience.   2Tone handles QRM better than the group delay from a narrow filter.73,Ed W0YK -- Original message --From: john@kk9a.com Date: 2/17/21 17:37 (GMT-08:00) To: cq-contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00100.html (8,466 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:26:32 -0800
Not necessarily, and top RTTY ops like Ed run wide as their default, narrowing only when a strong signal moves in real close. That's how I've done it for a while. 73, Jim K9YC (KU6W in WPX) _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00101.html (8,534 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:14:37 -0600
Like Ed, I generally run a wider roofing filter and rely on the decoder software to do the close in filtering.  It takes a while to wrap your head around the idea that what we hear as humans is not r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00102.html (10,425 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: dimitri <cosson-dimitri@bbox.fr>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:05:40 +0100
Hi Jim, You're right, but during contests, my default filters are 300 hz with the FTDX5000 and 250 hz with the IC7600, 3 decoders for each transceivers and the results are between  0,1 and 0,3 % of c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00104.html (9,097 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu