Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+Sprint\s+Contest\s+\-Reply\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+Sprint\s+Contest\s+\-Reply\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: Tue Sep 16 12:45:42 1997; Hi Wayne, Not according to the rules published on both the LA9HW and SM3CK or any other contest calendar I have seen. According to the "Special QSY Rule", one has to qsy ONLY after soliciting a qso v; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00096.html (10,867 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: Tue Sep 16 20:36:34 1997; Thanks for the response. If this has been resolved so definately, it should be (and should have been) an easy matter to slightly revise the rules to make it clear. Yet, the rules remain ambiguous. Re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00099.html (10,652 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Sep 17 00:57:11 1997; Why not just forget the QSY rule and then nobody will have to worry about doing something wrong. I thought the rule was there to make the contest different and fun. If everyone tries to circumvent th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00101.html (11,329 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough); Date: Tue Sep 16 23:11:02 1997; The rules are only ambiguous in the sense that they do not spefically enumerate every possible QSO solicitation scenario. If you do something that causes someone to call you, that is a solicitation,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00102.html (10,354 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: Tue Sep 16 12:45:42 1997; Hi Wayne, Not according to the rules published on both the LA9HW and SM3CK or any other contest calendar I have seen. According to the "Special QSY Rule", one has to qsy ONLY after soliciting a qso v; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00337.html (11,020 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: Tue Sep 16 20:36:34 1997; Thanks for the response. If this has been resolved so definately, it should be (and should have been) an easy matter to slightly revise the rules to make it clear. Yet, the rules remain ambiguous. Re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00338.html (10,709 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Sep 17 00:57:11 1997; Why not just forget the QSY rule and then nobody will have to worry about doing something wrong. I thought the rule was there to make the contest different and fun. If everyone tries to circumvent th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00340.html (11,195 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: Tue Sep 16 12:45:42 1997; Hi Wayne, Not according to the rules published on both the LA9HW and SM3CK or any other contest calendar I have seen. According to the "Special QSY Rule", one has to qsy ONLY after soliciting a qso v; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00448.html (10,974 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil); Date: Tue Sep 16 20:36:34 1997; Thanks for the response. If this has been resolved so definately, it should be (and should have been) an easy matter to slightly revise the rules to make it clear. Yet, the rules remain ambiguous. Re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00449.html (10,667 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest -Reply (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Sep 17 00:57:11 1997; Why not just forget the QSY rule and then nobody will have to worry about doing something wrong. I thought the rule was there to make the contest different and fun. If everyone tries to circumvent th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00451.html (11,061 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]