Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+Reflections\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: K5NZ@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:40:29 EST
A couple of things stick out that I just have to mention... Why does it become more important to let someone know they show as a dupe in your log than to just work them? If your being called by someo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00028.html (7,440 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:29:30 -0500
One of my favorites is on voice when a person calls back to a voice CQ in the proper method of my call sign first, then his. I enter my call sign in the log without even thinking about it, so then I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00029.html (9,421 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:35:53 -0700
I wonder if this was the same op who lectured me with similar profanity in 1994 on using /5 in my exchange during the CW Sweepstakes contest? It was my first contest from this new QTH, and having be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00034.html (8,117 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:32:51 +0000
And while were on the subject.... Why send 5NN instead of 599? This isn't CW. What's with all the CR/LF stuff? I need to see your section before you scroll it off my screen. What's with the LDC's (lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00035.html (10,447 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:58:52 -0600 (CST)
If someone did that to me, I'd just drop it and spin the dial ... 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00036.html (8,299 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:34:28 -0500
I think what computer programmers need to do is have a "signal lost" indicator on the screen. RTTY is not like normal modes (sorry, the Devil made me say that) in that the operator often cannot hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00037.html (8,635 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:58:40 +0000
<html><P>This is a different situation. The signal isn't lost, resulting in random garbage scrolling the screen. The guy can be plenty loud and there's a Mark or a Space there the whole time. He CHOO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00038.html (10,057 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:09:09 -0600
nz, What's that you say, you're in TX??? Dang, I gotta go fix my log... again! Geez, I'm glad I've got 30 days to get all this stuff sorted out. :-) What caught my attention this year was the handful
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00039.html (9,742 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:57:42 -0500
K0SR asked: "What's with the LDC's (long delayed responses)? Some guys wait 15 or 20 seconds before answering your CQ. Why?" Simple, and logical answer! SO2R C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00040.html (7,614 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:19:23 -0000
I had a few cases where it was due to keyboarding disasters. The call would be so messed up when I typed it in that I had to wipe it and start over. Call me old fashioned, but I type in the RTTY call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00041.html (8,816 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:58:37 -0700
I saw this too and it was primarily non contesters. I think they were just waiting for the right time and hey it worked! I doubt it was SO2R for most. _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00042.html (8,804 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:00:38 -0700
I alternated from keyboard to mouseing. Most of the time I would key the section in if it was a new station in the log. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00043.html (9,690 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Brooks" <bill.ke5og@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:48:35 -0600
Tom, I love it..."don't pee before your water comes". With your permission I can think of a lot of uses for that statement. Sometimes the SO2R guys (me included) drag but I don't imagine it ever taki
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00045.html (10,549 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:28:40 -0500
"What's with the LDC's (long delayed responses)? Some guys wait 15 or 20 seconds before answering your CQ. Why?" I always wondered about this too but this weekend I operated M/S for the first time at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00048.html (8,415 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Paul T. Antos" <wb2abd@roadrunner.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:21:12 -0500
< What's with the LDC's (long delayed responses)? Some guys wait 15 or 20 seconds before answering your CQ. Why?> Steve - because some stations ( like me ) haven't done a RTTY contest in almost 2 dec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00051.html (9,739 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:56:09 -0000
It's the so2r guys (like me). If an so2r station has just started a qso on his run frequency, it can definitely take 20 seconds to complete that qso. Meanwhile, if he has you dialed in on the s&p rad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00052.html (9,251 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:14:40 -0600
I was eating. Dale, kg5u _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00053.html (8,797 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: "B. Scott Andersen" <bsandersen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:34:15 -0500
Just a quick note: I tuned to 14.100 to check out the DX beacon this weekend only to hear RTTY there instead. These beacons on 20m-10m are very useful for DXers, but only if they can be heard. I'd li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00054.html (8,516 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:49:16 -0800 (PST)
I was on 20M CW Sunday afternoon. I sent my exchange, and was shocked when the other op replied by going on a rant, complete with profanity, on how I was wasting his time and mine by signing the /5.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00056.html (7,411 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:06:38 -0700
I got lots of TOO's I figured out this was 599 Not sure why TOO over 599 though. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00062.html (10,422 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu