- 1. [CQ-Contest] RE: 9M0C & ARRL CWDX (score: 1)
- Author: n7mal@ctaz.com (MAL)
- Date: Tue Feb 24 20:37:57 1998
- There were a lot of negative comments prior to the contest regarding 9M0C not operating in the contest. I worked them on 40 and 80 on Sunday morning. Because of all the negative comments I verified I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00274.html (6,874 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] RE: 9M0C & ARRL CWDX (score: 1)
- Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
- Date: Tue Feb 24 18:28:09 1998
- OK, here's some feedback. I'm really glad that they got on and handed out some QSOs during the contest. Their signal on 160 Saturday morning was the best I had observed during their entire operation
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00276.html (7,737 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu