- 1. [CQ-Contest] RBN System? (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 11:11:36 -0500
- Do the RBN sites have a min speed to be detected ummm thing? I'm getting ready for the Slow Speed Open. I CQed for close to ten minutes at 10 WPM, and not a single RBN grabbed me. But at 15 Wpm a few
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-09/msg00009.html (6,687 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN System? (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:36:00 -0400
- I'm not aware of any minimum speed, but suspect that at slow speeds, hand-sent CW may vary from the ideal often enough so that Skimmer will get confused. Joe, if you want to experiment and have the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-09/msg00010.html (7,803 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN System? (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 09:28:57 -0500
- I'm using N1MM+ and a Winkeyer USB to send the CW. First test was with the code being sent with a Farnsworth mode at 15 wpm. (15 wpm letters, spaced so it's at 10 wpm) and after not getting detected
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-09/msg00011.html (8,872 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN System? (score: 1)
- Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 20:41:11 -0500
- I got decoded okay at 10 wpm multiple times over the past couple SSTs, Joe. Here's tonight's RBN for me: https://www.reversebeacon.net/main.php?rows=10&max_age=10,hours&spotted_call=N5OT&hide=distanc
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-09/msg00012.html (8,603 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu