Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RBN\s+Stats\s+for\s+CQWW\s+CW\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:35:57 -0500
-- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. ___________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00008.html (6,877 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 20:57:20 +0100
Hi Thanks for sharing, was there an increase compared to previous years? looks like FT8 did not kill CW CONTESTS 73's Filipe Lopes CT1ILT - CR6K F4VPX - TM3M _________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00009.html (7,824 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 12:10:52 -0500
CT1ILT asks: The raw RBN spot archive is actually available online for research by anyone interested. Go to reversebeacon.net, click on "dx spots", then "download raw data". For past 4 years: 2016: 6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00010.html (6,965 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 21:10:57 +0100
Thanks Tim 73's Filipe Lopes CT1ILT - CR6K F4VPX - TM3M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00011.html (7,808 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 06:31:04 -0500
As these figures suggest, I have seen no impact on HF Contest participation as a result of FT8. Its changed VHF contesting but thats easily changed if the VHF Contesting community wants to do it. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00012.html (9,223 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:24:12 -0500
Ed, Some of these FT8 guys sure seem territorial like nets, SSTVer's and DXer's. I had several FT8 stations intentionally send digital on top of me during the ARRL 160 contest this weekend. I was at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00019.html (10,882 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Stats for CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:52:45 -0800
The same considerations as for CW and SSB -- antenna bandwidth and worldwide frequency allocations. FWIW, I heard very little FT8 during ARRL 160M, possibly because many FT8 ops also work CW. I use i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00020.html (8,933 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu