Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RA3CO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RA3CO\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RA3CO (score: 1): Author: "Tony Rogozinski" <trogo@telegraphy.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 20:32:11 +0100; It's interesting to me that I have visited the stations of two of the operators who filed the complaint agains RA3CO and was permitted to make QSO's using their calls. Their complaint was based on tw; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00075.html (7,360 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] RA3CO (score: 1): Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:51:00 -0400; In all Danny Weil's travels, the one, only, country where he got into a hassle with local hams was Colombia. It's all in my book. Jim Cain, K1TN www.arrl.org/catalog/yasme/ It's interesting to me tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00078.html (7,448 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] RA3CO (score: 1): Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:13:29 -0800; Either RA3CO was properly authorized to operate, or he wasn't. That's the core of the issue. Demonizing the HK hams won't affect that simple fact, and demonizing todays HK hams based on Danny Weil's; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00080.html (7,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]