Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+QST\.\.\.A\s+radical\s+thought\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:09:14 EST
I have been doing some thinking....uh, oh! Perhaps the answer to this line score thing is to offer a QST subscription in two forms. One would be the traditional hard copy in its present form. The oth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00169.html (8,822 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:15:50 -0500
How about offering advertisers a special "sponsorship" and advertising rate to pay for the line scores? Give them special mention and prominence on the line score pages. After all, the awards and tro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00173.html (8,505 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander Teimurazov" <at@at-communication.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:25:25 +0300
Hi Mike With my experience there is no problem with sponsorship there is problem with policy Some people is just think that contesting is not interesting etc etc 73 Al 4L5A/D4B ______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00176.html (9,364 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 06:42:09 -0800
Bill, K4XS suggested an interesting option for consideration: subscription in two forms. An interesting option, Bill. Maybe even 3 tiers: Gold - Silver - Bronze (the latter being for those who ONLY w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00179.html (9,879 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:28:30 -0800
ARRL Member already do get contest scores online weeks, if not a whole month, before the printed issues of QST arrive. Right now, the results of the 2004 ARRL August UHF Contest are online, but have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00181.html (9,372 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:31:02 -0800
form. as because of version. among And this differs from the current situation how? As I see it, you currently get BOTH of these options from your current membership: QST in traditional form and acc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00206.html (12,810 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:38:36 EST
I spoke with two of the reps from the ARRL today at the Tampa Bay Hamfest and mentioned my idea about the possible on-line delivery of QST. I also mentioned that this would allow addtional lines scor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00237.html (9,713 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:12:32 -0500
That's typical of politicians who look only at raw numbers and make decisions based on polls (the Bill Clinton School of leadership). What the boys in Newintgon fail to realize (and the politicians
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00240.html (9,946 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Warren C. Stankiewicz" <nf1j@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:44:12 -0800
Uh, they're not the League. You are. They're supposed to listen to you, not the other way around. When your directors and vice directors come up for election, mobilize and vote. That's where clubs c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00242.html (11,725 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:30:17 EST
signicant focus for the ARRL and that the focus of the boys in Newington is the guys who are the no-code techs, and the boys who frequent two meters. They are the majority of the ham population. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00243.html (9,614 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Richard" <k4no@mchsi.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:38:00 -0600
Are No-Code Techs called Silent Keys when they pass on? Greg K4NO is They rubber _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00244.html (10,481 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 21:43:12 -0500
Ward (et al), I would think at least part of your idea would be very easy to implement. Just add a new line to the outputted Cabrillo file format. Call it something like "Send Results To:" (yes, I kn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00245.html (14,819 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: Lew <Lew@dsl-only.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:31:58 -0800
Greg Richard wrote: Are No-Code Techs called Silent Keys when they pass on? Naw... They're called FB (Flat Battery) 73 and I remain, Lew _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00247.html (9,062 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Yeah, no kidding. Glad to hear they don't care about me. Show the totally illogical thinking on their part: 1. Ignore the ones who work the hardest to get the advanced licenses, and cater to the ones
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00248.html (11,468 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Actually, since you can get the average 2 meter HT for $125 or so, 1 7800 equals 85 HTs or so. 73s John NE0P Ignored by ARRL due to my contesting preference __________________________________ Do you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00249.html (8,679 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:45:14 -0800 (PST)
No, they are currently silent keys. http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00250.html (11,303 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:49:22 -0800 (PST)
For sale: 1. An Icom 756 HF/6 meter radio, comes with mic, manual, power cord. Has built in keyer, and will thrown in a set of Bencher paddles with the black base. 2. an Icom 706 HF/6/2 meter radio,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00251.html (10,038 bytes)

18. RE: [CQ-Contest] QST...A radical thought? (score: 1)
Author: "John Wilcox / NS1Z" <ns1z@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:26:52 -0000
Nope, Limp Ducks... Are No-Code Techs called Silent Keys when they pass on? Greg K4NO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00253.html (8,930 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu