Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Propagation\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Propagation\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Propagation question (score: 1): Author: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:47:02 +0000; I'm reviewing VOACAP SNR graphs as I usually do before a major contest. I'm puzzled by one thing. Just like last year, it appears that the MUF should dip below 7mHz at around 0300Z just like last yea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00418.html (8,044 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Propagation question (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:15:56 -0700; VOACAP sure doesn't trump real-world experience ! On this path, VOACAP is incorrect. Most nights, the MUF is too low on our end of the path at Europe sunrise, thus no opening. The best time for weste; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00423.html (8,903 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Propagation question (score: 1): Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>; Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:16:55 +0100; By coincidence I was just reviewing my log for the same matter seen from my side. Last year I worked 7 stations from z3 on 40m, at utc times (all on Saturday): 14.51 (W7) 14.58 (W6) 15.07 (W7) 15.09; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00427.html (9,067 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Propagation question (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:00:38 -0800 (PST); Remember too that the MUF is defined as the highest frequency that is open 50% of the days. That means half the time it won't be open, and the CQWW probably just fell in that other 50%. 73s John AA5J; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00429.html (10,182 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]