Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Prohibiting\s+Interleaved\s+CQs\s+on\s+Two\s+or\s+More\s+Frequencies\s+in\s+the\s+Same\s+Band\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:00:46 -0400 (EDT)
I recommend that alternating CQs on two or more frequencies on the same band be prohibited immediately in all ARRL HF contests, exactly as it is now prohibited in all CQ WW DX Contests and for multi-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00345.html (9,239 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:08:09 -0400
I strongly support Frank's proposal, but the prohibition should apply to Single Ops, too, as it does in CQ WW. I realize that multi-op stations are more likely to be equipped to do alternating CQs on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00349.html (10,729 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:32:28 -0400
Agree. Alternating CQs on two or more frequencies on the same band should be prohibited for all categories in single-mode contests, not just for multi-operator entries. But I would consider NOT apply
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00352.html (14,523 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:41:38 -0400
I take some issue with limiting single ops to one running band. I've been in any number of contests where one or two bands are open and I am working to see if a third (marginal) band is runable. In W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00355.html (13,422 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:03:56 -0700
Is there a 'compelling' reason NOT to? Maybe it is because some people CAN'T do it so they don't want ANYBODY to do it. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00357.html (9,387 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:50:03 -0600
If you agree that the rules need to be changed, you need to make your ARRL Division Directors aware of your feelings. I believe there is a meeting coming up soon and I believe that this item can be t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00358.html (13,652 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:48:10 +0000
The appropriate person would be the contest advisory committee member for your district. Listing is here: http://www.arrl.org/arrl-staff-cac You could copy Bart as well and your division director but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00361.html (16,934 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prohibiting Interleaved CQs on Two or More Frequencies in the Same Band (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:13:14 +0000
Thanks for the nudge Ria Our Local CAC rep is Cas K3WW will send Him a email voicing my opinion. I would advise other to do the same Wayne W3EA Your ARRL CAC rep http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00384.html (19,049 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu