- 1. [CQ-Contest] Principles behind multipliers (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:35:50 -0700
- In the discussion of whether or not the District of Columbia should be a separate multiplier from the state of Maryland in the NCJ North American QSO Party, all sorts of rationales for multiplier sta
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00025.html (10,458 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Principles behind multipliers (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:30:47 -0400
- Based on this, DC is fully contained within Maryland even though it is separately administered just as Big Bend National Park is administered separately from Texas. In only care as it relates to the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00028.html (9,371 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Principles behind multipliers (score: 1)
- Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list1@towncorp.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:11:02 -0400
- The issue could be as simple as US postal state designations. A resident of Washington DC uses what abbreviation for their postal address? I use Augusta, GA. 'GA' being the key. If they use MD, then
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00030.html (8,083 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Principles behind multipliers (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:03:34 -0400
- Wow -- This discussion has gone far, far beyond my simple request to change the geographic locator reference and multiplier value of the District of Columbia for the North Amnerican QSO Party contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00039.html (8,021 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu