Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Practicalities\s+of\s+Maritime\s+HF\s+Operation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Practicalities\s+of\s+Maritime\s+HF\s+Operation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Practicalities of Maritime HF Operation (score: 1): Author: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM)" <lyndon+cq-contest@orthanc.ca>; Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:11:04 -0800; --On 2005-3-28 9:08 PM -0700 "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote: Cheaper? I don't think so. However owning a boat carries a very heavy on-going cash flow burden, so sailors are very careful; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00472.html (12,255 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Practicalities of Maritime HF Operation (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:26:22 -0800; The ICOM M-700 is available for $1099 from BoatersWorld.com. An ATU is not needed for anyone smart enough to get a ham license. For someone who can afford an ocean-going yacht, the cost difference is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00485.html (10,453 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Practicalities of Maritime HF Operation (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:07:51 -0500; Yes, but the amateur equipment isn't type-accepted for use on the maritime frequencies. You saved money by purchasing an illegal radio. There are many ways to "save" money by ignoring rules and regul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00507.html (11,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]