Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Post\s+contest\s+log\s+massaging\s+$the\s+issue\s+in\s+a\s+nutshell\s+\-maybe\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Post\s+contest\s+log\s+massaging\s+$the\s+issue\s+in\s+a\s+nutshell\s+\-maybe\?$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Post contest log massaging (the issue in a nutshell -maybe?) (score: 1): Author: "Ivo Pezer E73A/9A3A" <ivo.pezer@alice.it>; Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:09:43 +0200; I fully agree with your comments Doug. Paperlog time is over and there is no need for a 30 day submission period. In the old days post contest dupe checking was a must, task on its own, but had to be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00074.html (11,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]