Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s+Cheerleaders\-enforcement\s+IMPOSSIBLE\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Packet\s+Cheerleaders\-enforcement\s+IMPOSSIBLE\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders-enforcement IMPOSSIBLE! (score: 1): Author: Ted KT1V <kt1vbulk@demop.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:16:59 -0500; There cannot really be any significant enforcement, because there is no authentication. Someone can log in under a fake callsign to hide their identity, just as easily as someone can assume a specifi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00321.html (9,343 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders-enforcement IMPOSSIBLE! (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 13 Nov 2004 08:08:32 -0600; If you do so via Internet, do not the nodes have a record of the IP address used? Is self-spotting important enough to cause KT1V to figure out which ISP WC1M is using & take out an account on the sa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00328.html (8,631 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]