Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Omitting\s+callsigns\s+in\s+exchanges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Omitting\s+callsigns\s+in\s+exchanges\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Joseph Giasi" <jgiasi@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:27:17 -0500; Instead of requiring that one's own callsign be part of the exchange, how about a change in the rules to require that the exchange include the callsign of the previous station worked (send your own; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00180.html (8,074 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in exchanges (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:53:00 -0700; The rules aren't broken, so why "fix" them? Only some ignorant or smart-a** ops are. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00187.html (7,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]