Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Odd\s+exchanges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Odd\s+exchanges\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:18:11 -0400; I usually adhere to the "log what is sent" mantra. A little off tangent, but a reasonably strong EU sent me "UTT" this weekend. That's no issue, I get it's 200, however the odd thing was that he sent; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00157.html (8,169 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:46:02 -0500; Let's not forget about a particularly favorite exchange addition of mine: "Please copy..." It's as if your mama taught proper social graces by saying, "If you're not polite with these contesters, the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00158.html (9,510 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:56:46 -0600; I would assume that more time was wasted because probably many people wouldn't understand the cut numbers and would ask for repeats. I get the T good enough, but I would have to think about the U one; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00160.html (9,827 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:06:53 -0500; Is that like when during your run, the station (always weak and slow) comes back to you and sends your call twice and then his call twice (and then others, in their impatience, dump in their call whi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00162.html (10,760 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:05:49 +0000; As a novice CW op I would like to know if there are acceptable cut numbers? And if so, what are they? 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00165.html (9,764 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:42:05 -0600; At least in the US, the 3 cut numbers most often used are T for 0, N for 9, and A for 1. T and N are commonly used here and understood. A is slightly less used but pretty well understood here also. T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00167.html (10,789 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:51:05 +0000; and now.. you know why I don't work ssb contests. we aren't even thru the ssb contests, yet the whining has started. Have a great day, --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy "Actions speak louder than words"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00169.html (12,734 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:44:46 -0700; Bob, You left out the /QRP at the end, which is always copiable. Funny how the selective fade always happens during the real suffix. Barry W2UP On 2/19/2018 1:06 PM, Bob Shohet, KQ2M wrote: Is that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00174.html (11,519 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:01:41 -0500; I would never considering using anything other than E for 5 (and only as a part of 599), T for zero, and N for 9 (and again probably only as a part of 599. A for 1 and U for 2 are OK to receive but d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00175.html (11,306 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:35:16 -0500; I believe that the following are all of the cut numbers: 0 = T, 1 = A, 2 = U, 3 = V, 5 = E, 7 = B, 8 = D, 9 = N . 0, 1, 5 and 9 are most commonly cut. Some are so rarely used that I am not 100% sure; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00177.html (8,215 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: Larry via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:51:03 -0700; You can't play the music if you don't know all of the notes. -. --... -.. -.. Sent by Larry I would never considering using anything other than E for 5 (and only as a part of 599), T for zero, and N; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00179.html (12,132 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Odd exchanges (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:33:54 -0500; Best story of mine this weekend was that I had two non 5 callsigns, one a 9, send IN which I quickly logged and then they sent TX, so they were "in" Texas. Then I had a slow sending 5 call me a littl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-02/msg00181.html (12,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]