Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+No\s+Dit\-Dit\s+\(was\s+Sending\s+Speed\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: "Hal Offutt" <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:54:43 -0400
Rather than seeing this practice as rude, I take it as a compliment when an experienced Sprinter does not send "dit-dit" after I send my information. He is saying, in effect, "I think you are a good
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00242.html (9,235 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:13:57 +0200
May be not true in all cases. During this years`s WPX CW I operated qrp and had quite a few stations terminating the efforts to establish an exchange by simply starting another CQ (after my last tran
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00250.html (8,058 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:04:39 -0500
P.T. Barnum was right. Here's my opinion of what he's saying: "Gee this software is just GREAT, all I had to was copy his number since I already have his name and state from earlier on 20 meters. Ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00262.html (8,660 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:04:30 -0500
Oh, Hal. Here's where you and I disagree. I need that acknowledgement of his having received my exchange. The ack is as much a part of the QSO as the exchange. The absence of an ack does not a QSO m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00264.html (8,470 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:03:43 -0700
No, No, No...I respectfully disagree completely. To "assume" anything in the heat of battle (and Monster QRM) is a gigantic...even Titanic class mistake. 73... Rick, K6VVA (Pse don't tell my Hand The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00265.html (7,513 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: 4X4KF <4x4kf@iarc.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:29:06 +0300
I disagree as well. It is like leaving some friends house without saying hello, or hanging just up after a phone conversation. It is a part of the QSO as well as a matter of politeness. Michael 4x4kf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00271.html (9,882 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 18 Sep 2006 09:12:50 -0500
The Sprint rules have incorporated both callsigns into the exchange - you have to send the other guy's call even though you supposedly already know it - and compliance is nearly 100%. Maybe the Sprin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00272.html (8,860 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 18 Sep 2006 09:20:34 -0500
What would concern me about this practice, is what happens if I *didn't* copy your exchange and *did* ask for a fill -- but that request got clobbered by three other stations calling. It's happened t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00273.html (9,397 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed) (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:45:51 -0700
"Rather than seeing this practice as rude, I take it as a compliment when an experienced Sprinter does not send "dit-dit" after I send my information. He is saying, in effect, "I think you are a good
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00276.html (9,261 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu